Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Williams v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02732
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint Corporation
Plaintiff:
Shalace L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Elmore v. Whitmer et al
as 8:2021cv00714
Defendant:
Donna Hamilton, Amber Whitmer and Sprint Corporation
Plaintiff:
Treamon Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Latham et al v. The 1953 Trust et al
as 1:2020cv07102
Defendant:
Miramax, llc., Sir Philip Green, David Boise and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe (1-10), Tracey Y. Latham, Jane Doe (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abergel v. Sprint Corporation
as 1:2019cv06410
Plaintiff:
Isaac Mike Abergel
Defendant:
Sprint Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
State of New York et al v. Deutsche Telekom AG et al
as 1:2019cv05434
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Colorado, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Softbank Group Corp., T-Mobile US, Inc., Deutsche Telekom AG and others
Petitioner:
Charter Communications, Inc., Altice USA, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 at
Solomon v. Sprint Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv05272
Defendant:
Andrew Davies, Sprint Corporation and Michel Combes
Plaintiff:
Isaac Solomon
Brown v. Sprint Corporate Security Subp
as 19-561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
Danielle Whitmer, Sprint Corporate Security Subpoena Specialist and Wendy Klang
Osofsky v. Sprint Corporation
as 1:2018cv03257
Plaintiff:
Caryn Osofsky
Defendant:
Sprint Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Witherspoon v. International Olympic Committe
as 17-2919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Defendant - Appellee:
International Olympic Committee, Nico Van Der Meulen Architects CC, KB Design and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
