Cases 1 - 8 of 8
RHC Operating LLC v. City of New York
as 22-923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHC Operating LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Eric Adams, in his official capacity as Mayor of New York City, Adrienne E. Adams, New York City Council Member and others
King v. City of New York
as 22-231
Plaintiff:
Andy King
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andrew L. King
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, New York City Council, Cory D. Johnson and others
RHC Operating LLC v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2021cv09322
Plaintiff:
RHC Operating LLC
Defendant:
City Of New York, Mayor Bill De Blasio, Adrienne E. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ragbir et al v. Homan et al
as 1:2018cv01159
Plaintiff:
Ravidath Lawrence Ragbir , New Sanctuary Coalition of New York City , Casa De Maryland, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Thomas D. Homan , Thomas R. Decker , Scott Mechkowsky and others
Amicu:
Yvette D. Clarke, Joe Crowley, Adriano Espaillat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Backus v. Connecticut Community Bank NA
as 11-2245
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ben R. Backus, Lavinia F. Zack, David C. Johnson and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Connecticut Community Bank NA
Backus v. Connecticut Community Bank NA
as 11-1344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ben B. Backus, Kimberly M. Backus, Lavinia F. Zack and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Connecticut Community Bank NA
Backus et al v. Connecticut Community Bank NA
as 3:2010cv00798
Plaintiff:
Ben R. Backus , Kimberly M. Backus , Lavinia F. Zack and others
Defendant:
Connecticut Community Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Backus et al v. Connecticut Community Bank NA
as 3:2009cv01256
Plaintiff:
Ben R. Backus, Kimberly M. Backus, Francesco Scaturchio and others
Petitioner:
Carol P. Dargan
Defendant:
Connecticut Community Bank NA and Connecticut Community Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
