Cases 1 - 10 of 118
UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10030
Plaintiff:
UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund, UFOA FAMILY PROTECTION PLAN LOCAL 854, UFOA FOR RETIRED FIRE OFFICERS FAMILY PROTECTION PLAN and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LL v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America
as 21-2745
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, a Delaware series limited liability company, Series PMPI, a designated series of MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC, a Delaware series limited liability company and MSPA Claims I, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., a Delaware profit corporation, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A, Inc., a Delaware profit corporation, FKA Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., a Delaware profit corporation and others
Defendant:
Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.
Sparzo v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00504
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Sparzo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re ACTOS Antitrust Litigati
as 20-1994
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Crosby Tugs, LLC, Meijer, Inc., Painters District Council No. 30 Health and Welfare Fund, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuitcals U.S.A., Inc. and others
In Re: Actos Direct Purchaser
as 20-2002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
American Sales Company, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Meijer Distribution, Inc., Cesar Castillo, Inc., Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. and others
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company v. American Sales Company, LLC
as 20-485
Respondent:
Cesar Castillo, Inc., Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Takeda Pharamceuticals, U.S.A., Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Takeda America Holdings, Inc. and others
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company v. United Food and Commercial Wor
as 20-481
Respondent:
NECA-IBEW Welfare Trust Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly sitiated, A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Buildings Trade Welfare Plan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund and others
Petitioner:
Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda Pharmaceuitcals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Spellman v. Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05608
Defendant:
Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. and Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Spellman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
DeRico v. Shire, PLC. et al
as 7:2019cv06764
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Liberty Mutual Group Inc., Lincoln National Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
MaryAnn DeRico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm Fed. Question: Family and Medical Leave Act
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc.
as 1:2019cv05610
Plaintiff:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, Series PMPI and MSPA Claims I, LLC
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
