Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
O'Neal v. Zenk
as 2:2021cv01299
Plaintiff: Brontie O'Neal
Defendant: Carolyn A Zenk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RAZ Trading L.L.C. et al v. Hunts Point Co-Operative Board et al
as 1:2015cv10091
Plaintiff: RAZ Trading L.L.C., Associates LLP and Kevin Razzoli
Defendant: Hunts Point Co-Operative Board, Hunts Point Board Members, Alphas Company of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Espinoza v. Brooklyn Metropolitan Detentio
as 13-2059
Plaintiff - Appellant: George Espinoza
Defendant: Brooklyn Metropolitan Detention Center and Cornell Companies/Moshannon Valley Correctional Center
Defendant - Appellee: Zenk, Warden, Lamadue, Unit Manager, Francisco, Case Manager and others
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1662
Plaintiff: Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Akil Sachveda and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Ibrahim Turkmen, Akhil Sachdeva, Anser Mehmood and others
Defendant - Appellee: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1002
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-999
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: James Sherman
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1003
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: Salvatore LoPresti, MDC Captain
Turkmen v. Ashcroft We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-981
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: Warden Dennis Hasty, former Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center(MDC), James Sherman, Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center and others
Bobby Maldonado v. Zenk
as 11-2042
Plaintiff - Appellant: Bobby Maldonado
Defendant: Zenk, Warden, Booher, Assistant Warden, Francine, Dr. and others
Defendant - Appellee: Michael Borecky, Dr. and Francis Francin, Dr.
Lavezzari v. Zenk et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02365
Defendant: Bear, James E. Burrell, Ms. Smolley and others
Plaintiff: Roberto Miranda Lavezzari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?