Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,143
John Koehler v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-9000
Plaintiff: JOHN JOSEPH KOEHLER
Defendant: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Ashley Georges v. Helen Godby, et al
as 24-1884
Plaintiff: ASHLEY GEORGES
Defendant: HELEN C. GODBY and YVONNE SMITH SEGARS
Christopher Hall v. Mark Wahl, et al
as 24-1525
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT MARK WAHL, UNIT MANAGER MICHAEL SKUTACK, UNIT MANAGER JOE D'EANGLES and others
USA v. Don Hough
as 24-1921
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DON RAOUL HOUGH
Mark Woods v. Shawn Wills, et al
as 24-1928
Plaintiff: MARK WOODS
Defendant: POLICE OFFICER SHAWN WILLS, #3680 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O THOMAS STRAIN, #4005 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O LT. HOYT, #225 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Karlester Young v. Kip Hallman, et al
as 24-1920
Plaintiff: KARLESTER YOUNG
Defendant: KIP HALLMAN, President of Wellpath Holdings, PAUL NOEL, Chief Medical Director, ANTHONY LITIZIO and others
Samuel Lowry v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 24-1509
Plaintiff: SAMUEL LEE LOWRY
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
Steven Hill v. Camden County Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1486
Plaintiff: STEVEN M. HILL
Defendant: CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CFG MEDICAL SERVICES
Dwayne Rieco v. Michael Zaken, et al
as 24-1882
Plaintiff: DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant: MICHAEL ZAKEN, MARK HAMMER, Physicians Assistant, WILLIAM NICHOLSON and others
Damien Schlager v. John Wetzel
as 24-1900
Plaintiff: DAMIEN M. SCHLAGER
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of the Department of Corrections (Official and Individual Capacity)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?