Cases 11 - 20 of 52,212
Edwin Soto-Santana, et al v. Stephan Wengen
as 24-2032
Plaintiff:
EDWIN SOTO-SANTANA and YANAHIRA SOTO
Defendant:
STEPHAN WENGEN, Individually
Rodney Derrickson v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 24-2047
Plaintiff:
RODNEY DERRICKSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Greg DeYoung v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 24-2049
Plaintiff:
GREG DEYOUNG
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY
Shawn Williams v. Jaime Sorber, et al
as 24-2046
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JAIME SORBER, Former Superintendent of SCI Phoenix, JOHN E. WETZEL, Former Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and GEORGE M. LITTLE, Former Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
John Delach v. Lindy Paving Inc, et al
as 24-2036
Plaintiff:
JOHN DELACH
Defendant:
LINDY PAVING INC and LOCAL 341, IBT
Procter & Gamble U.S. Business Services Co, et al v. Estate of Jefffrey Rolison, et al
as 24-2034
Plaintiff:
PROCTER & GAMBLE US BUSINESS SERVICES CO, As Plan Administrator And On Behalf Of The Procter & Gamble Profit Sharing Trust and Employee Stock Ownership Plan and PROCTER & GAMBLE SAVINGS PLAN
Defendant:
ESTATE OF JEFFFREY ROLISON, Deceased, MARGARET M. LOSINGER and MARY LOU MURRAY
Marvin Howard, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 24-2010
Plaintiff:
MARVIN HOWARD and PAMELA HOWARD
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
4301 N Delaware QOB LLC v. Selective Insurance Co of South Carolina
as 24-2005
Plaintiff:
4301 N DELAWARE QOB LLC
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE CO OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In re: Mu'Mit Muhammad a/k/a Keith Lamont Drain
as 24-1995
Petitioner:
In re: MU'MIT MUHAMMAD A/K/A KEITH LAMONT DRAIN
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY CENTRE COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
