Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Everett Terry v. Borough of Yeadon, et al
as 15-3271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVERETT K. TERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF YEADON, MAYOR DOLORES JONES-BUTLER, IN HER OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, ASHER KEMP and others
Kevin Brathwaite v. Phelps, et al
as 15-1803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN C. BRATHWAITE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, DAVID PIERCE, CHRISTOPHER KLIEN and others
James Biggins v. C. Danberg, et al
as 15-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Kevin Brathwaite v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 14-1750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN C. BRATHWAITE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, DEPUTY WARDEN DAVID PIERCE, CHRISTOPHER KLEIN and others
USA for The Use and Benefit of v. Aeroplate Corp, et al
as 13-2394
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF STEVEN F. KEMP BUILDING MATERIAL COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
AEROPLATE CORP and RONALD D. PATTERSON
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Ivan Mendez v. Perry Phelp
as 11-3654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN L. MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
PERRY PHELPS, L. SAVAGE, LINDA KEMP and others
Ivan Mendez v. Christine Kemp, et al
as 11-3655
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN L. MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE KEMP, Law Library Clerk and REBBECCA DUTTON, Law Library Clerk
Ivan Mendez v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 11-3653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN L. MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
PERRY PHELPS, L. SAVAGE, LINDA KEMP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
