Cases 21 - 30 of 162
Kobe Pinkney v. Meadville Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-1095
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KOBE PINKNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MEADVILLE, ALLEGHENY COLLEGE, DUNCAN FREELAND and others
Defendant / Appellant:
PATROLMAN JARED FRUM
Pedro Santiago-Espinosa v. Wellpath Medical, et al
as 22-2964
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO SANTIAGO-ESPINOSA
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLPATH MEDICAL, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, P.A. JOE WALSH, Physician Assistant and others
Joe Thorpe v. Township of Salisbury, et al
as 22-2448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE THORPE
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF SALISBURY, DEBRA J. BRINTON, SANDY NICOLO and others
Joe Thorpe v. Township of Salisbury, et al
as 22-2447
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE THORPE
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF SALISBURY, DEBRA J. BRITTON, SANDY NICOLO and others
JoAnn Fonzone v. Joe Oteri, et al
as 22-2301
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOANN FONZONE, AKA Judy McGrath
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE OTERI, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICER KELECHEWISCKY and others
In re: Erick Pringle, et al
as 22-1993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
In re: ERICK PRINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
ELON MUSK, AMAZON INC, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Defendant:
BELLEVUE HOSPITAL NEW YORK, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANDREW CUOMO and others
Mac Truong v. Lakeland Bank, et al
as 22-1946
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DR. MAC TRUONG
Defendant / Appellee:
LAKELAND BANK, LAKELAND BANCORP INC, ALTHEA HOWARD and others
John Reardon v. Phil Murphy, et al
as 22-1858
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN E. REARDON
Defendant:
GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY, ATTORNEY GENERAL GURBIR S. GREWAL, B. SUE FULTON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE GEORGE SINGLEY, JUDGE JOHN MORRELLI, PROSECUTOR DANIEL LONG and others
USA v. Joseph Richard
as 22-1690
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH RICHARD, aka "Black Joe"
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1650
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
