Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Monte Blair v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-4169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTE D. BLAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE, REGINA MCDONALD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-4137
Debtor - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lena Davenport v. Borough of Homestead, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-3892
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LENA DAVENPORT, an adult individual
Defendant - Non-Participating:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, a Municipal corporation, NATHAN HARPER, Commander, in his official capacity as a Chief of Police of the City of Pittsburgh, BOROUGH OF HOMESTEAD, a Municipal Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LOUIS SCHWEITZER, individually and in his official capacities as a Police Officer of the City of Pittsburgh, STEPHEN MATAKOVICH, individually and in his official capacities as a Police Officer of the City of Pittsburgh, CALVIN KENNEDY, individually and in his official capacities as a Police Officer of the City of Pittsburgh and others
Defendant - Appellee:
IGOR BOYKO, individually and in his official capacity of a Police Officer of the City of Pittsburgh
Leon Ford v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 16-3426
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEON D. FORD
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH and POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL KOSKO
Defendant - Appellant:
POLICE OFFICER DAVID DERBISH and ANDREW MILLER
Dale Shaffer v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 15-3242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE SHAFFER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, NICHOLAS J. BOBBS, in his official and individual capacities and ANTONIO CIUMMO, in his official and individual capacities
Jordan Miles v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 15-3108
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JORDAN MILES, an adult individual
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, a municipal corporation, MICHAEL SALDUTTE, individually and in his official capacities as a Police Officer of the City of Pittsburgh, DAVID SISAK, individually and in his official capacities as a Police Officer if the City of Pittsburgh and others
Jordan Miles v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 15-3082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORDAN MILES, an adult individual
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, a municipal corporation, MICHAEL SALDUTTE, individually and in his official capacities as a Police Officer of the City of Pittsburgh, DAVID SISAK, individually and in his official capacities as a Police Officer if the City of Pittsburgh and others
Nicole Kenney v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 15-2738
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICOLE KENNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and others
Michael Ellis v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 15-1951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Municipality, Government Entity, OFFICER MATTHEW WHITE, City of Pittsburgh Police, Community Relations Officer, JEFFREY W. LABELLA, City of Pittsburgh Police Officer, Indv. & Entity and others
Nikki Bruni, et al v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 15-1755
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIKKI BRUNI, JULIE COSENTINO, CYNTHIA RINALDI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, PITTSBURGH CITY COUNCIL and MAYOR PITTSBURGH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.