Cases 31 - 40 of 517
Anna Nupson v. Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, et al
as 22-3401
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANNA K. NUPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS, LLP and BRUCE A. ROSENFIELD, Esq,
Intervenor / Appellee:
JOHN S. MIDDLETON, indiv. & as frmr Trustee of Trust of Frances S. Middleton as modified, frmr co-Trustee of the Trusts of Anna M. Bauer, and Executor/co-Executor of Estates of Herbert H. Middleton, Jr., and Frances S. Middleton and BRADFORD HOLDINGS INC
Appellee:
BLANK ROME LLP, Non-Party Respondent on Motion to Compel
Cajoeco LLC, et al v. Benefit Plans Administration Services Inc, et al
as 22-3407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAJOECO LLC, NORMAN MAIS, Individually, as Trustee, Administrator, and Beneficiary of Cajoeco LLC Profit Sharing Trust and CARMEN MAIS, Individually,as Trustee,and Beneficiary of Cajoeco LLC Profit Sharing Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
BENEFIT PLANS ADMINISTRATION SERVICES INC, CONSULTING ACTUARIES INTERNATIONAL INC, HARBRIDGE CONSULTING GROUP and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE NOS. 1-100, a fictitiously named busines entity(ies)
Edith Farina, et al v. Bank of New York, et al
as 22-3383
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDITH FARINA and EMILIO FARINA
Defendant / Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC, BANK OF NEW YORK, as trustee for the CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2007-8 and RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS INC
In re: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Derivative Lit
as 22-3027
Plaintiff / Appellee:
In re: COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN LAUTZENHEISER, Derivatively on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., MICHAEL S. GRANIERO, III, Derivatively on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., MARJORIE A. HOY, as Trustee and Beneficiary of the James. B. Hoy & Marjorie A. Hoy TTEES FBO Marjorie A. Hoy Rev Liv Trust Derivatively on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP, GORDON COBURN and STEVEN E. SCHWARTZ
Erie Insurance Exchange v. Erie Indemnity Co
as 22-8051
Respondent:
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, an unincorporated association, by TROY STEPHENSON, CHRISTINA STEPHENSON, and STEVEN BARNETT, trustees ad litem, and alternatively, ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, by TROY STEPHENSON, CHRISTINA STEPHENSON, and STEVEN BARNETT
Petitioner:
ERIE INDEMNITY CO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2303
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
1900 Capital Trust II by US Bank Trust National As v. Antonello Boldrini
as 22-8034
Plaintiff / Appellee:
1900 CAPITAL TRUST II BY US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, not in its Individual Capacity but solely as Certificate Trustee
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONELLO BOLDRINI
Utility Workers United Association Local 537 v. Utility Workers Union of America AFL CIO System Lo, et al
as 22-2262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UTILITY WORKERS UNITED ASSOCIATION LOCAL 537, an unincorporated association, by J. Kevin Booth, Its Trustee ad litem
Defendant / Appellee:
UTILITY WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA AFL CIO SYSTEM LOCAL 537, an unincorporated association, D. MICHAEL LANGFORD, an individual, MICHAEL COLEMAN, an individual and others
USA v. Edwin H. Zimmerman, et al
as 22-2192
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWIN H. ZIMMERMAN, IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY AND AS TRUSTEE O THE SUNNY SIDE FAMILY TRUST, THE WEMER TRUST, AND THE HINKLEVILLE HOLDINGS TRUST and WILMER N. ZIMMERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG MCCONKEY, RUTH ANN BURKHOLDER, KEYSTONE CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC and others
Defendant:
ESTHER ZIMMERMAN
Luzerne County, et al v. Antonello Boldrini, et al
as 22-2173
Plaintiff / Appellee:
1900 CAPITAL TRUST II BY US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, in its individual capacity and as certificate trustee and LUZERNE COUNTY
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONELLO BOLDRINI and DANIELE A. BOLDRINI, a/k/a Daniele Boldrini a/k/a Daniele Argentati
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
