Cases 41 - 50 of 981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kevin Potter, et al v. David Newkirk, et al
as 23-2625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN POTTER and MARGUERITE POTTER
Defendant:
DAVID NEWKIRK, ROBERT ROBBINS, JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERRIFS DEPARTMENT NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR CUMBERLAND COUNTY, JON REILLY and others
USA v. Michael Johnson
as 23-2584
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL R. JOHNSON
Derrick Gibson v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 23-2529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK GIBSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, MANDY SIPPLE, BRITTANY HUNER, CORRECTION HEALTH CARE ADMIN and others
Ahmad Johnson v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 23-2578
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMAD JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Teo Johnson, et al v. City of Clifton, et al
as 23-2550
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEO JOHNSON, TEO T. POWELL and ZENA L. POWELL, a/k/a The Johnson-Powell Group, LLC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CLIFTON, CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and THE CITY OF CLIFTON ABC LICENSING BOARD
Kevin Johnson v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 23-2531
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN F. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Frank Hubbard v. Gary Lanigan, et al
as 23-2359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK HUBBARD
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY LANIGAN, STEVEN JOHNSON and RALPH WOODWARD
Defendant:
MARY LANG
Marcus JohnsonIn re: Marcus Johnson
as 23-2334
Petitioner:
In re: MARCUS JOHNSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Armoni Johnson v. Superintendent Coal Township SCI, et al
as 23-2289
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMONI MASUD JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
