Cases 41 - 50 of 102
Gatson v. FBI
as 17-3122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL GATSON, AKA Tokyo Gatson
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Bradley Beers, et al v. Attorney General United States, et al
as 17-3010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY BEERS and JOSEPH DIVITA
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES and others
Dennis Obado v. United States Federal Governme, et al
as 17-2926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS OBADO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Gilbert Martinez v. USA, et al
as 17-2947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT M. MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EDWARD G. SMITH, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, EAGLE DISPOSAL and others
Frederick Banks v. Soo Song, et al
as 17-2791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOO C. SONG, J. ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Frederick Banks v. Adrian Roe, et al
as 17-2789
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIAN N. ROE, Esq., MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT S. CESSAR and others
Frederick Banks v. Adrian Roe, et al
as 17-2787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIAN N. ROE, Esq., MARK R. HORNAK, J. ROBERT CESSAR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2795
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Frederick Banks v. Soo Song, et al
as 17-2792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOO C. SONG, J. ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
