Cases 81 - 90 of 185
USA v. Jordan Murphy
as 16-4348
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORDAN MURPHY, a/k/a Murph, a/k/a, Gooch, a/k/a Turtle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-4202
Debtor - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
William Staples v. USA, et al
as 16-3733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM STAPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES SAMUEL, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator of National Inmate Appeals and others
Constitution Party of Pennsylv, et al v. Pedro Cortes, et al
as 16-3266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONSTITUTION PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, GREEN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PEDRO A. CORTES and JONATHAN M. MARKS
Jennifer Millington v. GEICO, et al
as 16-2393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JENNIFER MURPHY MILLINGTON, also known as Little Crow
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO and PAMELA ANTHONY
In re: James Murphy
as 16-2139
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES E. MURPHY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mel Marin v. Roberta Biros, et al
as 16-1998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERTA BIROS, MERCER COUNTY CONSERVATIVES, DAVID BIROS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
OFFICER MURPHY
William Staples v. USA, et al
as 16-1391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM STAPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES SAMUEL, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator of National Inmate Appeals and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
