Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Sandra RumanekIn re: Sandra Rumanek
as 24-1634
Petitioner:
In re: SANDRA RUMANEK and DR. OLGA A. KATZ
Respondent:
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL MANAGEMENT INC, SHERRY R. FALLON, DAVID G. CULLEY and others
USA v. Michael Boyer
as 23-3253
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL BOYER
Ason Brown v. Dwayne Lardin, et al
as 23-3115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASON BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT DWAYNE LARDIN, CAPTAIN STEPHANIE FRANK, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BOYER and others
Sandra RumanekIn re: Sandra Rumanek
as 23-2724
Petitioner:
In re: SANDRA RUMANEK
Respondent:
BERNARD G. CONAWAY, INDEPENDENT SCHOOL MANAGEMENT INC, DAVID G. CULLEY and others
Reginald Boyer v. Dave Bruno, et al
as 23-2620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGINALD BOYER
Defendant:
DAVE BRUNO, DETECTIVE MANIGUALT and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Sandra Rumanek v. Sherry Fallon, et al
as 22-2020
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA RUMANEK
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERRY R. FALLON, DAVID G. CULLEY, TIMOTHY M. HOLLY and others
Defendant:
MATTHEW DENN and SPILLAN
Anant Tripati v. Wexford Health Sources Inc., et al
as 22-1861
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC, MATTHEW R. ZWICK, SAMUEL H. FORMAN and others
Sandra Rumanek v. Sherry Fallon, et al
as 21-1348
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERRY R. FALLON, CHARLES E. BUTLER, MATTHEW F. BOYER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA RUMANEK
Rateek Allah v. Martinez, et al
as 20-2313
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT RACKOWSKI, FCC - ALLENWOOD, PAMELA COOK, FCC - ALLENWOOD, CORRECTION OFFICER LEON, FCC - ALLENWOOD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RATEEK ALLAH
A. J., et al v. Lancaster County, et al
as 20-1154
Defendant / Appellee:
ESQ. COURTNEY J. RESTEMAYER, ROBIN BOYER, ESQ. DAVID J. NATAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
K. J. and A. J.
Defendant:
CHRISTINE SEBASTIAN-BAIR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
