Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Jermaine Carter v. Colm Connolly, et al
as 24-1952
Plaintiff: JERMAINE L. CARTER
Defendant: COLM F. CONNOLLY, COLLINS J. SEITZ and SHANE TROXLER
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff: JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant: JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Jermaine Carter v. Colm Connolly, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff: JERMAINE L. CARTER
Defendant: CHIEF JUDGE COLM F. CONNOLLY and COLLINS J. SEITZ
Brandon AdamsIn re: Brandon Adams
as 24-1334
Petitioner: In re: BRANDON ADAMS
Respondent: NAVIENT CORP and COLM F. CONNOLLY
Judeau Brown, Jr.In re: Judeau Brown, Jr.
as 23-3066
Petitioner: In re: JUDEAU S. BROWN, JR.
Respondent: ROBERT MAY, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and COLM F. CONNOLLY
Sharon JamesIn re: Sharon James We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-2640
Petitioner: In re: SHARON M. JAMES
Respondent: COLM F. CONNOLLY, United States Honorable Chief Justice, JOHN A. CERINO and RICHARD G. ANDREWS
Donald ColeIn re: Donald Cole We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-2349
Petitioner: In re: DONALD COLE
Respondent: CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner, PERRY PHELPS, Warden, FRANK PENNELL, Chaplain and others
Michael Washington v. , et alIn re: Michael Washington v. , et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-2269
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL T. WASHINGTON
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE, WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and COLM F. CONNOLLY
Lawyers for Fair Reciprocal Admission v. USA, et al
as 23-1154
Plaintiff / Appellant: LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: COLM F. CONNOLLY and MARYELLEN NOREIKA
In re: Bernard D. Ellerbe
as 22-1070
Petitioner: In re: BERNARD D. ELLERBE
Respondent: WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and COLM F. CONNOLLY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?