Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Doherty KushimoIn re: Doherty Kushimo
as 22-2740
Petitioner:
In re: DOHERTY KUSHIMO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DAVID S. CERCONE
Henry Stubbs, III v. Greg Skrepenak, et al
as 22-2277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
GREG SKREPENAK, TODD VONDERHEID, STEPHEN A URBAN and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES, THOMAS L. AMBRO and others
Anthony Abbatiello v. Abigail Legrow, et al
as 20-2823
Defendant:
JULIE A. FINOCCHIARO, Deputy Attorney General, T-MOBILE USA LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATIONS, BRIAN DALY, Special Investigator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY A. ABBATIELLO
Darrell Law v. Thomas MaCauley, et al
as 19-2473
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAWN DOHERTY, JUSTICE STRINE, DE Supreme Court, JUSTICE SEITZ, DE Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL LAW
Albert Robinson v. Section 23 Property Owner's As, et al
as 19-1310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT ROBINSON
Defendant:
BARBARA SCOTT, JAY BARRY ROSMAN and ELIZABETH SEBASTIAN
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW DESCHENES, ROGER D. EATON, MICHAEL ROSS MARSH and others
Undetermined:
TODD MILLER
Robert Naslanic v. Jason Gula, et al
as 17-3334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT S. NASLANIC
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON GULA, SCRANTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF SCRANTON and others
Mary Doherty, et al v. Allstate Indemnity
as 17-1860
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY L. DOHERTY, JAMES DOHERTY and JOHN DOHERTY
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY
William Pittman v. Metuchen Police Department, et al
as 16-1829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
METUCHEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOROUGH OF METUCHEN, DAVID IRIZARRY, LIEUTENANT and others
Patricia Jennings-Fowler v. City of Scranton, et al
as 16-1256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA JENNINGS-FOWLER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SCRANTON and MAYOR CHRISTOPHER DOHERTY, Individually
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
