Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Jamal Parker v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 23-1182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor Beneficiary a a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in Propria Persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae d/b/a Jamal El Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior et al, MERRICK B. GARLAND, d/b/a Attorney General et al, ANDREW SAUL, d/b/a Commissioner et al and others
USA v. David Mathis
as 23-1005
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID LOUIS MATHIS
Jay MathisIn re: Jay Mathis
as 22-3433
Petitioner:
In re: JAY GREGORY MATHIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Jay Mathi
as 17-3383
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAY GREGORY MATHIS
USA v. David Mathi
as 17-1568
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID LOUIS MATHIS
Shawn Walker v. Shanda Mathis, et al
as 16-3681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN T. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
SHANDA MATHIS, KERSCHNER, CYNTHIA LINK and others
Marvin Mathis v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 16-2083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN MATHIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Derrick Mathis v. PECO Inc, et al
as 15-2968
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK MATHIS
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAWN LEE, Attorney for PECO Bankruptcy Department, GARY F. SEITZ and PECO ENERGY CO
Derrick Mathis v. PECO Inc, et al
as 15-2968
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK MATHIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PECO INC, SHAWN LEE, Attorney for PECO Bankruptcy Department and GARY F. SEITZ
Thomas Mathis v. Joseph Ryan, et al
as 13-4219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS BRADY MATHIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH M. RYAN, Superintendent, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
