Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1601
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in hr official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1602
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in her official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1593
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in her official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Amicus Curiae:
MORRIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE, LAURA ALI, the New Jersey Republican Chairs Association and JOSE ARANGO
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1594
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk, MARY H. MELFI, in her capacity as Hunterdon County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Appellant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY DEMOCRATIC ORGANIZATION, LAURA ALI, NEW JERSEY REPUBLICAN CHAIRS ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
FULOP FOR GOVERNOR, ELECTION LAW CLINIC AT HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NEW JERSEY and others
Jason Brown, et al v. Cyrus Dolbin, et al
as 23-3143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON L. BROWN and A. M. B., Minor Child of Jason L. Brown
Defendant:
CYRUS P. DOLBIN, Judge, MARK A. BARKET, Custody Officer, KAREN E. RISMILLER, Lawyer and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. DOMALAKES, Judge, DAVID RICE, Asst. DA, MICHEAL A. STINE, Public Defender and others
John Rush v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-2838
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN L. RUSH
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI
Larry Rush v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 23-2177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY RUSH, a/k/a LEROY THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Sheldon Morris v. Washington City Police Department, et al
as 22-3103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHELDON LEE MORRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHINGTON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and DANIEL RUSH, a/k/a Dan Rush in his official and individual capacities, and as of yet unknown or unidentified individuals and any as of yet unknown groups
In re: Toshisada Onishi, et al
as 22-1589
Petitioner:
In re: TERUKO ONISHI, TOSHISADA ONISHI and D.A.O.
Respondent:
DAVID C. CHAPLEAU, In his individual and official capacity as St. Joseph County Judge, MICHAELENE M. MACHOWIAK, In their individual and official capacity as St. Joseph County Prosecutors, ELAINE B. BROWN, In their individual and official capacity as Judges of Indiana Court of Appeals and others
Shaun Rushing v. US District Court Western Dist
as 21-2761
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAUN RUSHING
Defendant:
US DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT KALLOMAZOO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
