Cases 1 - 10 of 1,691
Minerva Carbajal-Recinos, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2336
Petitioner:
MINERVA CARBAJAL-RECINOS, Y. S. C.-C., J. S. C.-C. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mayra Lopez-Barrera v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2217
Petitioner:
MAYRA LOPEZ-BARRERA and A. A. S.-L.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
International Security LLC v. Dana Berry, et al
as 24-2207
Defendant:
S. BENJAMIN PARSONS and DANA M. BERRY
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL SECURITY LLC
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Ronald Holloway, Sr.
as 24-2209
Defendant:
RONALD S. HOLLOWAY, SR., Individually, and as Principal Blood Chief of the Raritan Indians/SandHill Band of Indians and as trustee of the SandHill Indians Tribal Trust
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dashaan Smith v. Thomas McGinley, et al
as 24-2173
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, CAPTAIN DOLTON, GRIEVANCE OFFICER WHEARY and others
Plaintiff:
DASHAAN R. SMITH
Brian Loaiza Ramirez, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2177
Petitioner:
BRIAN DAVID LOAIZA RAMIREZ, LAURA ZAMBRANO ABADIA, J. S. L.Z. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kelen Oliveira, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2178
Petitioner:
KELEN CRISTINA OLIVEIRA, HENRIQUE HALLEY SALDANHA, E. C. S. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, et al v. , et al
as 24-2167
Petitioner:
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
Respondent:
GLENDA JOHNSON, JOHN MARSHALL, CAROLYN SAMPSON and others
G & S Beshay Trading Co LLC* v. 7 Eleven Inc
as 24-2129
Appellee:
GEORGE BESHAY
Defendant:
7 ELEVEN INC
Plaintiff:
G & S BESHAY TRADING CO LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
