Cases 11 - 20 of 101
SMITH v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2013cv04948
Petitioner:
ALEC EDMUND SMITH
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv04377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. BOYLE
as 2:2013cv03218
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and KERRI HANSEN
Defendant:
EDMUND N. BOYLE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604 a IRS: Complaint to Enforce IRS Summons
FOSTER v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv02972
Plaintiff:
EDMUND FOSTER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CHAD GRUGER , HOURN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIBECK v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2013cv02869
Plaintiff:
EDMUND LIBECK
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
LONG v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv06835
Plaintiff:
EDMUND J. LONG
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and GENERAL STEAMSHIP AGENCIES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
JONES v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2012cv06464
Plaintiff:
EDMUND CONRAD JONES
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. MCFARLAND et al
as 2:2012cv05977
Plaintiff:
WILBERT BENNETT
Defendant:
NANCY T. MCFARLAND, DONALD J. GRACIA, EDWIN P. CAMIEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDREWS et al v. MCFARLAND et al
as 2:2012cv05978
Plaintiff:
DARIUS ANDREWS and KWANELL MACK
Defendant:
NANCY T. MCFARLAND, DONALD J. GRACIA, EDWIN P. CAMIEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
