Cases 11 - 20 of 46
BURNETT v. MERCK & CO INC. et al
as 2:2021cv20030
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS BURNETT
Defendant:
Merck Co., Inc., MERCK SHARPE & DOHME CORP and MCKESSON CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMEY v. MERSH et al
as 2:2021cv02140
Petitioner:
MARQUIS RAMEY
Respondent:
ROBERT MERSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv01909
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ramey v. Lawrie et al
as 2:2020cv04576
Plaintiff:
Marquis Ramey
Defendant:
THOMAS LAWRIE and Jules Quartapella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2020cv03431
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SMITH, ISA RICHARDSON, JOHANA RAHMAN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and OFFICERS JOHN DOES #1-#100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANDLEBROOK MARQUIS PROPERTY OWNER, LLC v. THINK CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2020cv00121
Defendant:
THINK CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
CANDLEBROOK MARQUIS PROPERTY OWNER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv04257
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY v. HCV 121 S. BROAD, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00079
Defendant:
MARQUIS & CO., LLC, DAVIDA WILLIAMS, SSH MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
RAYNER v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2018cv04909
Petitioner:
MARQUIS LEE RAYNER
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
