Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 104
DEJESUS v. BERRYHILL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv04564
Plaintiff: TERESA DEJESUS
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FELDER v. MAY et al
as 2:2017cv04388
Plaintiff: ANTONIO FELDER
Defendant: GERALD MAY, ALLEYNE MARS, DEJESUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONCIO v. CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01862
Plaintiff: FRANK D. CONCIO
Defendant: CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC. and RICHARD DEJESUS JIMENEZ MUNOZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOTO v. CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2016cv06386
Plaintiff: CARLOS SOTO
Defendant: CITY OF READING , JESUS SANTIAGO-DEJESUS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEJESUS v. TEAMSTERS UNION et al
as 5:2016cv05471
Plaintiff: JAIME DEJESUS
Defendant: TEAMSTERS UNION and ABM JANITORIAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DEJESUS v. WEHRMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv04745
Plaintiff: LAZARO DEJESUS
Defendant: PAUL WEHRMAN, CRAIG BARRETT, CHRIS CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEJESUS TORRES v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv04576
Plaintiff: JUAN CARLOS DEJESUS TORRES
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SCI CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04346
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BURGIS et al v. BAYER CORP., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv03589
Plaintiff: MANDY BURGIS , AMANDA BURLESON , NATASHA BURNS and others
Defendant: BAYER CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DEJESUS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03206
Plaintiff: ALFREDO DEJESUS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?