Cases 1 - 10 of 302
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Diamond et al v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC
as 2:2024cv01701
Plaintiff:
H. JOSHUA DIAMOND, ROBERT P. ELSON and LORI ZINN
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC doing business as XFINITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hunt v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01346
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hunt
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMISIONER BLANCHE CARNEY, DEPUTY WARDEN HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
BONHAGE et al v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVING LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
MARK S. BONHAGE and MARY S. BONHAGE
Defendant:
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVING LLC, U.S. BANK ASSOCIATION, JUDGE ASHLEY M. CHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
ANDERSON v. XANITOS, INC.
as 2:2023cv04056
Plaintiff:
DIAMOND ANDERSON
Defendant:
XANITOS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DOUGHERTY v. CHAGARES et al
as 2:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
KEITH DOUGHERTY
Defendant:
CHIEF CHAGARES, CHIEF SANCHEZ, GEORGE WYLESOL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. PINTS & PIZZA, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv04133
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., STONE DIAMOND MUSIC CORP., SONGS OF UNIVERSAL, INC. and others
Defendant:
PINTS & PIZZA, LLC and ROBERT KEATES
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
