Cases 1 - 10 of 23
ERIE v. FRITZINGER et al
as 5:2020cv01652
Defendant:
POLICE CHIEF EDWARD BACHERT, OFFICER STEPHEN FRITZINGER, JOHN/JANE DOE SUPERVISORS and others
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNA ERIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIFFORD v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 2:2016cv02557
Plaintiff:
GERARD GIFFORD
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALWAN v. DEMBE et al
as 2:2014cv04001
Plaintiff:
YUWSHA ALWAN
Defendant:
PAMELA P. DEMBE, LILLIAN H. RANSOM, PATRICK F. DUGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JHANG et al v. KIM et al
as 2:2013cv06359
Plaintiff:
MYONG JA JHANG, KATHLEEN BANG WHAN CHANG and DONG IL KIM
Defendant:
PAUL DONG UK KIM, HAEKYONG KIM, KYUNG SOON KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RODRIGUEZ v. WIDENER UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2013cv01336
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
WIDENER UNIVERSITY , CITY OF CHESTER, PENNSYLVANIA, DAVID COUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MORGAN v. GIFFORD et al
as 2:2013cv01252
Plaintiff:
RAMAR MORGAN
Defendant:
GIFFORD , WOOD, STEBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MASSARELLI v. KELLY et al
as 2:2012cv05028
Plaintiff:
DAVID MASSARELLI
Defendant:
DANIEL KELLY, FRANK GREEN, MARIO CALUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIFFORD-WALKER et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv00267
Plaintiff:
KAREN GIFFORD-WALKER and JAMES WALKER
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
VONBERG v. RUBIN, GLICKMAN, STEINBERG & GIFFORD, P.C. et al
as 2:2011cv07699
Plaintiff:
DOBORAH F. VONBERG
Defendant:
RUBIN, GLICKMAN, STEINBERG & GIFFORD, P.C. and MARC D. COLLAZZO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIFFORD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59457
Plaintiff:
RICHARD H. GIFFORD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
