Cases 1 - 10 of 20
HALL v. NISBET et al
as 2:2024cv03301
Defendant:
ABINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT AND MUNICIPAL BUILDING, RAYMOND TOWNSEND, OSWALDO TOLEDO and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. NISBIT et al
as 2:2019cv04382
Defendant:
SERGEANT OSWALDO TOLEDO, OFFICER RAYMOND TOWNSEND, MUNICIPAL TOWNSHIP BUILDING and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 2:2012cv00169
Petitioner:
JAMES R. HALL
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALL v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67055
Plaintiff:
MELVIN R. HALL
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv35056
Plaintiff:
THOMAS R. HALL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HALL v. A.C. & S., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62048
Plaintiff:
ARLIS R. HALL
Defendant:
A.C. & S., INC., CELOTEX CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALL v. WALSH et al
as 2:2010cv07572
Petitioner:
SHAWN R. HALL
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA/YORK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALL v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv50125
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. HALL
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
COLLINS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv03053
Plaintiff:
STEVEN COLLINS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON SYSTEM, CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv66781
Plaintiff:
LESTER R. HALL
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., AMERICAN BRAKE SHOE CO., CAPE INSULATION CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
