Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Ghost Properties v. Borough of Starrucca et al
as 3:2016cv01683
Plaintiff:
Ghost Properties
Defendant:
Borough of Starrucca , Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
DOWTON v. ACEVEDO et al
as 3:2016cv00659
Plaintiff:
Donna Sue Dowton
Defendant:
Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. , Joe Doe(S) 1-10 and Yeandy C. Acevedo
Cross_claimant:
Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Yeandy C. Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Bradford et al
as 3:2014cv01372
Plaintiff:
Ricky Miller
Defendant:
Kevin R Bradford, Douglas J. Jacobs, Raymond J Tonkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeJohn v. Pitt Ohio Express, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01417
Plaintiff:
Ryan D DeJohn
Defendant:
Pitt Ohio Express, LLC and Doe Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Violation of Fair Labor Act of 1938
McGraw v. BEO Service Group et al
as 4:2012cv00779
Plaintiff:
Michael McGraw
Defendant:
BEO Service Group, Novus Exploration, Vanderra Management and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elsevier Inc. et al v. Comprehensive Microfilm & Scanning Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv02513
Plaintiff:
Elsevier Inc. , Elsevier B.V. , Elsevier Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Comprehensive Microfilm & Scanning Services, Inc., James A. Wasilewski and John Does Nos. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
FULKROD et al v. DI PINTO BROTHERS TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 4:2008cv00498
Plaintiff:
James Fulkrod and Dawn Fulkrod
Defendant:
Di Pinto Brothers Transportation Inc., Jose A. Cruz-Adorno, John Doe Nos 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Boling v. Bussanich et al
as 3:2007cv01133
Plaintiff:
Oliver M. Boling, Oliver M. Boling, Oliver M. Boling and others
Defendant:
Dr. Anthony Bussanich, Ivan Navarro, Luis Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
