Cases 21 - 30 of 51,705
Kendall v. SCI-Muncy Medical Department
as 4:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Khanyae Sade Kendall
Defendant:
SCI-Muncy Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spudis, Jr. v. Metro Mattress Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
William Spudis, Jr.
Defendant:
Metro Mattress Corporation and David Adler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Stone v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Marc Stone
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tenney v. Edger et al
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Sherry Tenney
Defendant:
Paul Edger, Mia Paone, Sarah Frasch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolfe v. Rivello et al
as 3:2024cv00814
Petitioner:
James A Wolfe
Respondent:
John Rivello, Michelle A Henery, Seth F. Butner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Pennsylvania Parole Board et al
as 1:2024cv00816
Petitioner:
Timothy Brown
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Parole Board and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens v. Pharmasource, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Shayla Owens
Defendant:
Pharmasource, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Lentz v. Family Health Council of Central Pennsylvania, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lentz
Defendant:
Family Health Council of Central Pennsylvania, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Daugherty v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
Lisa B. Daugherty
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
