Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01363
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
McNeil v. Global Tel-Link et al
as 3:2015cv01243
Plaintiff:
Terry McNeil
Defendant:
Global Tel-Link and Glenda Rankins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2015cv01170
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson, R. Chism and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Proctor v. McCullough et al
as 3:2015cv00988
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Proctor
Defendant:
McCullough, S. Ellenberger, The Five Program Review Committee Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Altenbach v. Link et al
as 3:2014cv02431
Plaintiff:
Gregory Altenbach
Defendant:
Dave Link, Tammy Ferguson and Dave Smead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton v. Wetzel
as 1:2014cv01367
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hampton
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Mariosa Lamas, Jeffery Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Tyson et al
as 1:2013cv02202
Plaintiff:
Amos Tate
Defendant:
Tyson, Tammy Ferguson, William Frantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piskanin v. Lamas et al
as 1:2013cv01843
Plaintiff:
Michael John Piskanin, Jr.
Defendant:
Marirosa Lamas, Link, Corizon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donahue v. Hazleton Career Link et al
as 1:2013cv01285
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Donahue
Defendant:
Hazleton Career Link, PA Department of Labor and Industry and Luzerne County Workforce Investment Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donahue v. Stolfa et al
as 3:2013cv01276
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Donahue
Defendant:
Elaine Stolfa, Other Luzerne County & PA Career Link and Workforce Investment Staff, Angelo Salvatore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
