Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Noel v. Wolf et al
as 4:2020cv00430
Defendant:
Josh Shapiro, Robert Marsh and Tom Wolf
Plaintiff:
Harold W. Noel, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarver v. Pennsylvania Attorney General Office et al
as 1:2020cv00199
Petitioner:
Foster Lee Tarver
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General Office, Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas and Josh Shapiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Helfrich et al
as 1:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Officer Troy Cromer, York County Police Department, Alisa Litavidis and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Helfrich et al
as 3:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Officer Troy Cromer, York County Police Department, Alisa Litavidis and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Ransome et al
as 3:2020cv00234
Respondent:
Superintendent Ransome, Josh Shapiro, Larry Krasner and others
Petitioner:
Terrance Pitts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moss v. Woolf et al
as 1:2019cv02129
Petitioner:
Craig Moss
Respondent:
Scott A. Woolf, Josh Shapiro, PA State Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nottingham et al v. Harry et al
as 3:2019cv01949
Respondent:
Jeanna Longo, Kenneth Osokow, Anthony Ciuca and others
Petitioner:
James E. Nottingham and William Haight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Auto Equity Loans of Delaware, LLC v. Shapiro
as 1:2019cv01590
Defendant:
Josh Shapiro
Plaintiff:
Auto Equity Loans of Delaware, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Harry, et al
as 3:2019cv01389
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, Laurel R. Harry and District Attorney of York County
Petitioner:
Jarrod R Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carpio-Santiago v. Tice et al
as 3:2019cv01407
Respondent:
Eric Tice and Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro
Petitioner:
Juan Carpio-Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
