Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Gill v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00922
Petitioner:
Joseph Gill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gill v. Goncalves Foernges, MD. et al
as 4:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Maria Gill
Defendant:
Luiz Goncalves Foernges, MD., Anne Theresa Lunney, MD., Matthew Scott Factor, MD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Herron v. Skilonger et al
as 3:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Jordan Lee Herron
Defendant:
Officer Thomas Skilonger, Officer Patrick Gill, Sergeant Anthony Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gill v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv01064
Plaintiff:
Charity Gill
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Colon et al v. UMPC Pinnacle Hospitals et al
as 1:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Susanna Colon and Saheem Richard Gill
Defendant:
Harrisburg Hospital, UMPC Pinnacle System, UMPC Pinnacle Hospitals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Staples-Reynolds v. Gills Gibson, INC.
as 3:2020cv01287
Plaintiff:
Joshua Staples-Reynolds
Defendant:
Gills Gibson, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Mote v. Murtin et al
as 3:2020cv00092
Defendant:
Detective Jack Gill, Trooper Matthew Tredor, Trooper Barry Brinser and others
Plaintiff:
Krishna Mote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. White
as 1:2019cv00484
Respondent:
Douglas K. White
Petitioner:
Stanley Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2018cv02352
Defendant:
Rex Wertz, Sipple, James Barnackle and others
Plaintiff:
Marcellus A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2016cv02548
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Jones
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Smeal, John Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
