Cases 1 - 10 of 195
BROWN v. ADAMS
as 2:2024cv01341
Defendant:
MS. ADAMS
Plaintiff:
SCOTTY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ADAMS
as 1:2024cv00264
Defendant:
MS. ADAMS
Plaintiff:
SCOTTY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ULRICH v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON
as 2:2024cv01282
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON
Plaintiff:
ADAM ULRICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. MILLS et al
as 2:2024cv01062
Respondent:
MR. ADAM BISHOP and JUDGE BETH MILLS
Petitioner:
ANTHONY D. HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS et al v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv01049
Defendant:
MELINDA ADAMS, BOWERS, ROTH and others
Plaintiff:
TONY YEAGINS and JAJUAN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WHITACRE et al
as 3:2024cv00154
Defendant:
HAIGHT, D. WALSH, C. BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM JOSEPH BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00152
Defendant:
IAN GUSTAFSON, STEPHEN HAGGERTY, COLBY HOLLIS and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CARDWELL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS, SHANE DADY, SERGEANT CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
