Cases 91 - 100 of 3,721
A.H. et al v. MEDICAL RESCUE TEAM SOUTH AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2023cv02176
Plaintiff:
A. H., MATTHEW H. and LORI H.
Defendant:
MEDICAL RESCUE TEAM SOUTH AUTHORITY, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOYE v. FAMILY COURTS
as 2:2023cv02112
Plaintiff:
NATHAN HOYE
Defendant:
FAMILY COURTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PEPKE v. MANOR HOUSE KITCHENS, INC.
as 2:2023cv02089
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PEPKE
Defendant:
MANOR HOUSE KITCHENS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
PARKER v. GAINEY et al
as 2:2023cv02102
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PARKER
Defendant:
EDWARD C. GAINEY, CITY OF PITTBURGH, BETHANY HALLAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALBERTY v. MT. LEBANON TOWNSHIP
as 2:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. ALBERTY
Defendant:
MT. LEBANON TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VAUGHN v. BOROUGH OF PORTAGE et al.
as 3:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
GARY E. VAUGHN and GARY E. VAUGHN, JR.
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF PORTAGE, ROBERT KOBAN, ROBERT FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIDSON v. RICE
as 1:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
LUCILLE A. DAVIDSON
Defendant:
PHILIP J. RICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
TOWNSEND v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. TOWNSEND, JR.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, FAMILY DIVISION CHILD SUPPORT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BECKWORTH v. CITY OF NEW CASTLE et al
as 2:2023cv02043
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY BECKWORTH
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW CASTLE, OFFICER HALIE ELIZABETH HOUK, OFFICER ANDREW OROURKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WINKLER v. ANDRZEJCZAK et al
as 1:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WINKLER
Defendant:
THOMAS ANDRZEJCZAK, TAD ACKER and BOROUGH OF CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
