Cases 41 - 50 of 104
GRAHAM et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00148
Defendant:
COUNSELOR BEERS, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION GREENE and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM and KEVIN R. SHAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIECO v. BUZZAS et al
as 2:2021cv00007
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER MR. GUYTON, JOHN DAVID HOOD, III, C/O2 HARAUSE and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DOE v. CO SUPT., et al.
as 2:2020cv01761
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER, LT., PRT and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN "G" DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MAYO v. ROGERS et al
as 3:2020cv00185
Defendant:
SERGEANT MCCLELLAND, CORRECTIONS OFFICER ROGERS and UNIT MANAGER TIMOTHY LITTLE
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MAYO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KELLY v. PA DOC et al
as 3:2020cv00143
Defendant:
MS. QUINN, UNIT MANAGER CONNOR COUNCIL, MR. SHELBY and others
Plaintiff:
SHAHEED KELLY and HAKEEM HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. NYBERG et al
as 1:2020cv00208
Defendant:
R. ROSCINSKI, CO HARMON, CINDY CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN L. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WELTY v. KULT, et al
as 2:2020cv00810
Defendant:
KULT, CHUCKY, UNIT MANAGER MISS TINA M. RENNER and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WELTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WINTON v. SMITH et al
as 3:2020cv00103
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH, UNIT MANAGER DARREN GINTER, DEPTY SUPT. DAVID CLOSE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WINTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIECO v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2020cv00582
Defendant:
CAPTAIN HONTMEYER, CAPTAIN KENNEDY, c/o1 JEUOTS and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
STONE v. KNEPPER et al
as 2:2020cv00594
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. STONE
Defendant:
LT. YUHOUSE, UNIT MANAGER TERRY KNEPPER and SGT. STRICKLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
