Cases 81 - 90 of 161
EASLEY v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2020cv00156
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN VETZEL, ERNIE MANGELUZZO, DR. WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIECO v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2020cv00582
Defendant:
CAPTAIN HONTMEYER, CAPTAIN KENNEDY, c/o1 JEUOTS and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SHAREEF v. O'DONNELL et al
as 2:2020cv00426
Defendant:
CO BRAIN PALKO, DA TERRY SCHULTZ, CO WATIMERE and others
Plaintiff:
HASAN SHAREEF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MAY v. BRADLEY et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GORAL and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CAMP v. HARPER et al
as 2:2020cv00112
Defendant:
MR. ERICH, WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER and CAPTAIN HUNGERMAN
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. CAMP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PHILLIPS v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2019cv00382
Defendant:
NURSE MURRAY, LIEUTENANT S.A. GATTO, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RUSSELL and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS CLAY PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WASHINGTON v. CAPTAIN CRUM et al
as 2:2019cv01460
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
MAJOR BAZUS, LT. TROUT, CERT TEAM JOHN DOES 1 TO 12 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MATHIS v. STRENG et al
as 2:2019cv01459
Plaintiff:
JANIIS MATHIS
Defendant:
Intelligence Captain B.J. SHEEDER, C/O STRENG and B.J. SHEEDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WOJNAROWSKI v. DOE et al
as 3:2019cv00174
Defendant:
SERGEANT NEDSMITH, JOHN DOE, CAPTAIN SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WILLIAM WOINAROWSKI and THOMAS WILLIAM WOJNAROWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ARMSTRONG v. FURMAN et al
as 3:2019cv00141
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JOSEPH FURMAN and JOSEPH DUPONT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
