Cases 21 - 30 of 89
SCHLAGER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
DAMIEN M. SCHLAGER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHIS et al v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv01573
Plaintiff:
JANIIS MATHIS and LAWRENCE MICHAELS
Defendant:
JOHN CARNEY, CLAIRE DEMATTE, PERRY PHELPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LEAPHART v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01546
Plaintiff:
HAROLD E. LEAPHART
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BARRY SMITH, BOBBI JO SALAMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MORRIS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01338
Plaintiff:
DEREYK L MORRIS and DEREYK L. MORRIS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, DEPUTY STEPHEN BUZAS, CAPTAIN KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
COOPER v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREA OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv00152
Plaintiff:
DALE T. COOPER
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREA OF CORRECTIONS, ORLANDO L. HARPER, CHIEF MEDICAL ASSISTANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
COSGROVE v. WELLPATH et al
as 3:2021cv00124
Defendant:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES COSGROVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CARTER v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2021cv00415
Plaintiff:
SEMAJ CARTER
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOE(S) 1, FNU LEFEVERE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PEREZ v. SCI FAYETTE SUPERINTENDANT JOHN/JANE DOE et al
as 2:2021cv00332
Defendant:
CITY OF LABELLE PENNSYLVANIA, JAMES BARNACLE, ANY AND ALL JOHN/JANE DOE DEFENDANTS SCI FAYETTE and others
Plaintiff:
PERCY PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
THURMAN v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2020cv01929
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, JOHN/JANE DOES and MR. BUZAS
Plaintiff:
EARL THURMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DOE v. CO SUPT., et al.
as 2:2020cv01761
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER, LT., PRT and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN "G" DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
