Cases 41 - 50 of 123
SABIR v. UNITED STATES et al
as 3:2021cv00195
Plaintiff:
RAFIQ SABIR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, WARDEN VICKIE MOSER, LIEUTENANT COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
THOMAS v. NEWMAN et al
as 1:2021cv00272
Plaintiff:
THORNE THOMAS
Defendant:
CO1 NEWMAN, CO1 BECKER, SGT. YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LEWIS v. PERRY et al
as 1:2021cv00174
Plaintiff:
ANDRE LEWIS
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER PERRY, CARTER and COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SCOTT v. DEPUTY CLOSE et al
as 3:2021cv00046
Defendant:
C/O 1 GONDEK, NURSE MICHAEL P RADAKER, DEPUTY CLOSE and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
INGRAM v. SCI SMITHFIELD, et al
as 2:2021cv00359
Defendant:
SCI SMITHFIELD UNIT MANAGER RUNK, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF PAROLE KIRK C. LOOSI, C. GORMAN and others
Plaintiff:
KAI D. INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRAHAM et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00148
Defendant:
COUNSELOR BEERS, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION GREENE and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM and KEVIN R. SHAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIECO v. BUZZAS et al
as 2:2021cv00007
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER MR. GUYTON, JOHN DAVID HOOD, III, C/O2 HARAUSE and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. CROWTHER et al
as 1:2020cv00337
Defendant:
MICHELLE CROWTHER, FACILITY MANAGER OVERMYER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MENTEER and others
Plaintiff:
MUSTAFA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
DOE v. CO SUPT., et al.
as 2:2020cv01761
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER, LT., PRT and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN "G" DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MAYO v. ROGERS et al
as 3:2020cv00185
Defendant:
SERGEANT MCCLELLAND, CORRECTIONS OFFICER ROGERS and UNIT MANAGER TIMOTHY LITTLE
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MAYO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
