Cases 31 - 40 of 51,062
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
NORSEN v. U.S. MARSHAL'S SERVICE et al
as 3:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
RICHARD DZIONARA NORSEN
Respondent:
U.S. MARSHAL'S SERVICE, U.S.ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND, MONROE COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
OZUNA MOTA v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Petitioner:
MIGUEL OZUNA MOTA
Respondent:
COLETTE PETERS and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WILLIAMS v. TRUMBULL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
GARRY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
TRUMBULL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
LEUTHE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
as 2:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
AARON LEUTHE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
BAILEY-BAKER v. PASQUARELLI et al
as 2:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Derrick Bailey-Baker
Defendant:
PASQUARELLI and sarver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ALEXANDER v. SUPERINTENDENT BROTHERS et al
as 2:2024cv00717
Petitioner:
KAREEM-LATEEF ALEXANDER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BROTHERS and PA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CUNNARD v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
LORI CUNNARD
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
