Cases 61 - 70 of 342
ROSARIO v. DEPARTMENT OF CITIZEN SERVICES DIVISION OF YOUTH SERVICES/ JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER et al
as 2:2022cv00781
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, ESSEX COUNTY JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER, DEPARTMENT OF CITIZEN SERVICES DIVISION OF YOUTH SERVICES/ JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wright v. University of Delaware et al
as 1:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Willie Wright
Defendant:
University of Delaware, Jane Roe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BERKOFSKY v. CHILES, et al.
as 2:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
EVAN BERKOFSKY
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, JAMAR CHILES, WILLIAM PENN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv20680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
DINOIA v. REALTY EXECUTIVES et al
as 2:2021cv20011
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. DINOIA
Defendant:
REALTY EXECUTIVES, JHON RIOS, CHRISTIAN VEGA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLON v. ROE et al
as 2:2021cv04779
Plaintiff:
JOSE ROLON
Defendant:
RICHARD ROE, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Me et al v. United States et al
as 2:2021cv19396
Plaintiff:
Jane Me, Jane Me1 and JON ROE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, U.S. DHS, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv17091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FANTINO et al v. COUNTY OF WESTMORELAND et al
as 2:2021cv00910
Plaintiff:
JOHN FANTINO and DEBBIE FANTINO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF WESTMORELAND, WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON, JOHN R. WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
