Cases 11 - 20 of 75
In Re: Amazon.com, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jay Smith and Thomas Stabile
Defendant:
Jeffrey P. Bezos, Andrew R. Jassy, Brian T. Olsavsky and others
Nominal Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Sebagh v. Paucek et al
as 1:2022cv01205
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sebagh
Defendant:
Christopher J. Paucek, Mark J. Chernis, Harsha Mokkarala and others
Nominal Defendant:
2U, Inc.
Max v. Marsh et al
as 1:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
Donna Max
Defendant:
Andrew Marsh, Paul B. Middleton, Maureen O. Helmer and others
Nominal Defendant:
Plug Power Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Prawitt v. Intrusion, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00735
Plaintiff:
Nathan Prawitt
Defendant:
Jack B. Blount, Michael L. Paxton, B. Franklin Byrd and others
Nominal Defendant:
Intrusion, Inc.
VAN HOOSER v. SCHLOTTERBECK et al
as 2:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
GARY VAN HOOSER
Defendant:
STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEIN v. SCHLOTTERBECK et al
as 2:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
SHIVA STEIN
Defendant:
STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RYAN v. SCHLOTTERBECK et al
as 2:2021cv01445
Plaintiff:
JAMES RYAN
Defendant:
STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mongiello v. Scarlett et al
as 1:2020cv01522
Defendant:
Karen Eastham, Robert J. Spiegel, Susan M. Molineaux and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry Mongiello
Nominal Defendant:
Geron Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TUNICK v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv11441
Defendant:
AMY E. HOOD, MICHAEL L. ESKEW, DAVID B. DILLON and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD TUNICK
Ford v. Aberle et al
as 1:2020cv00748
Defendant:
Mark Fields, Donald J. Rosenberg, Jeffrey Henderson and others
Nominal Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Brian Ford
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
