Cases 1 - 6 of 6
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Joseph et al
as 1:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Lornnette A. Joseph, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development of the Government of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Anthony Johnson v. State of Pennsylvania, et al
as 21-3359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, Solicitor and others
Defendant:
MARK COPOULOS, doing business as Brucha Holdings Realty, DIANE CORTES, doing business as Brucha Holdings Realty, COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, doing business as Brucha Holdings Realty and others
ESTATE OF JOHNSON v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv04597
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JOHNSON
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MARK COPOULOS doing business as BRUCHA HOLDINGS REALTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
LOPAZ v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 1:2019cv14868
Defendant:
BEN CARSON, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, BRIAN MONTGOMERY and others
Plaintiff:
SANDRA LOPAZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
GAUDINO v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 2:2018cv01076
Plaintiff:
MARK GAUDINO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT v. CONNOLLY et al
as 2:2009cv02744
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF UNION REHABILITATION PROGRAM, WILLIAM J. CONNOLLY, JOSEPHINE CONNOLLY and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
