Cases 61 - 70 of 228
HICKS v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv00540
Plaintiff:
MORGAN HICKS
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
DIPAOLA v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv01374
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DIPAOLA
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BAKSH v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv09054
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Plaintiff:
FAREED BAKSH
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BURTON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv05378
Plaintiff:
JORDAN BURTON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
TIGUE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv05468
Plaintiff:
MARTIN TIGUE
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BALCH v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv01237
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
MARK BALCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIES v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv00905
Plaintiff:
KEITH F DAVIES
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MCDADE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv01031
Plaintiff:
JOHN MCDADE
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
COLON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv00160
Plaintiff:
KERWIN COLON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
GALLAGHER v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv00176
Plaintiff:
SEAN GALLAGHER
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
