Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jill Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corp, et al
as 17-3006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JILL SIKKELEE, individually and as personal representative of the estate of David Sikkelee, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
PRECISION AIRMOTIVE CORP, PRECISION AIRMOTIVE LLC, individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Precision Airmotive Corporation, BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORP, individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Borg-Warner Corporation, and Marvel-Schebler, a Division of Borg-Warner Corporation and others
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant - Appellee:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, as successor by merger to Buffalo Pump, Inc., ARVINMERITOR INC, FKA Arvin Industries Inc, individually and as successor by merger to Rockwell International, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, FKA Borg Warner Inc and others
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant:
CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
HAMMELL et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 3:2014cv00013
Cross Claimant:
ARVINMERITOR, INC., CBS CORPORATION, CRANE CO. and others
Defendant:
BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
PNEUMO-ABEX, LLC., STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HAMMELL and LINDA HAMMELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
LAND et al v. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 5:2009cv80074
Plaintiff:
LEWIS BOBBY LAND and ARETHA M. LAND
Defendant:
AW CHESTERTON COMPANY, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC INC, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HERMAN v. B.F. GOODRICH et al
as 2:2009cv03678
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE E. HERMAN and Maureen Herman
Defendant:
B.F. GOODRICH, BONDEX INTERNATIONAL INC., BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
SANDERS et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC. et al
as 2:2009cv60082
Plaintiff:
THOMAS C. SANDERS and BARBARA A. SANDERS
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BISHOP et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS CLEAVER-BROOKS DIVISION et al
as 2:2007cv69153
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND WALTER BISHOP and ELAINE ROSS BISHOP
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS CLEAVER-BROOKS DIVISION, BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DAVIDSON, et al v. BORG WARNER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00940
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL TRUCK & ENGINE CORP., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., BRIGGS-STRATTON CORP. and others
Cross Defendant:
BORG WARNER CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
COLEEN M. DAVIDSON and THOMAS J. DAVIDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDONOUGH et al v. BORG WARNER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00939
Plaintiff:
DONALD W. MCDONOUGH and CHARLOTTE H. MCDONOUGH
Defendant:
BORG WARNER CORPORATION, BRIGGS-STRATTON CORP., DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
