Cases 21 - 30 of 61
BROWN v. C.B.H. OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv03241
Plaintiff:
JASON L. BROWN
Defendant:
C.B.H. OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and JOAN L. ERNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAZELTON et al v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES et al
as 1:2016cv07363
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE HAZELTON and JEFFREY HAZELTON
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Real Alternatives Inc, et al v. Secretary Department of Health, et al
as 16-1275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REAL ALTERNATIVES INC, KEVIN I. BAGATTA, Esq., THOMAS A. LANG, Esq. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
ROGERS v. SATAN GOD et al
as 2:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROGERS
Defendant:
SATAN GOD, BARAK OBAMA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROUSE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2015cv01511
Plaintiff:
ANDREA ROUSE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES, HUDSON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Real Alternatives, Inc. v. Burwell et al
as 1:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
Real Alternatives, Inc. , Kevin I Bagatta , Thomas A Lang and others
Defendant:
Sylvia Burwell, Thomas E. Perez, Jacob J Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JIN v. EXECUTIVE BRANCH CHIEF et al
as 2:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
KANG HYONG JIN and HAE SOOK PARK
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE BRANCH CHIEF, JEH JOHNSON, SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawrence Brandt, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
as 14-4087
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LAWRENCE E. BRANDT, as Trustee of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Greensburg, a Charitable Trust, ROMAN ARCHDIOCESE OF GREENSBURG, as the Beneficial Owner of the Greensburg series of the Catholic Benefits Trust, CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF GREENSBURG, an affiliate nonprofit corporation of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Greensburg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, in her official capacity as Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury and others
Lawrence Brandt, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
as 14-3663
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LAWRENCE E. BRANDT, as Trustee of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Greensburg, a Charitable Trust, ROMAN ARCHDIOCESE OF GREENSBURG, as the Beneficial Owner of the Greensburg series of the Catholic Benefits Trust, CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF GREENSBURG, an affiliate nonprofit corporation of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Greensburg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, in her official capacity as Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury and others
VALLEY FORGE CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD v. BURWELL et al
as 2:2014cv04622
Plaintiff:
VALLEY FORGE CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES , THOMAS E. PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
