Cases 21 - 30 of 87
Torres v. Oliver et al
as 3:2021cv02039
Plaintiff:
David Torres
Defendant:
Jason Oliver, Sean Haggarty, Christopher Burnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARR v. WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY et al
as 2:2021cv01560
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIE HARR
Defendant:
WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY, JOHN DOES 1-10, HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. PLUMER, JR.
as 3:2021cv17125
Plaintiff:
LORENZO OLIVER
Defendant:
SAMUEL J. PLUMER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EZEKWO v. NEW JERSEY DEPT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS et al
as 2:2021cv13026
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, GERALD ORATIO, SHEILA Y. OLIVER and others
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. ERIE COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv00162
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and ERIE COUNTY
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
H o/b/o Harry Hamilton et al v. Hamilton et al
as 3:2021cv00501
Defendant:
Amanda Ackley, Pennsylvania State University Athletics Department, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Harry E. Hamilton and H o/b/o Harry Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BETANCES v. AT&T INC. et al
as 3:2020cv02239
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. doing business as AT&T STORE WILKES BARRE, GABBY NORWOOD, OLIVER PHILPOTT and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS BETANCES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Feno v. Oliver et al
as 3:2020cv02242
Defendant:
Tyler O'Shura and Joshua Oliver
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Feno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETANCES v. AT&T INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04334
Defendant:
AT&T INC. doing business as AT&T STORE WILKES BARRE, GABBY NORWOOD, OLIVER PHILPOTT and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS BETANCES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gomez v. Sanzi et al
as 1:2020cv01113
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Nathan V. Oliver, Gary B. Sanzi and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrio Martin Wazar Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
