Cases 61 - 70 of 117
RAMOS v. LOCAL GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2017cv00792
Plaintiff:
GREGORY RAMOS
Defendant:
LOCAL GOVERNMENT, COUNTY SHERIFF, SCOTT A. MUMMERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VUKICH v. COMMONWEALTH BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00441
Petitioner:
WILLIAM E. VUKICH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH BEAVER COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DELGADO v. SOTO-FIGUEROA et al
as 5:2017cv01041
Plaintiff:
NATHAN DELGADO
Defendant:
COLILE MARIE SOTO-FIGUEROA, EMMANUEL ALEXIS MORALES-VAZQUEZ, MICHAEL E. MCHALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitman v. State of Pennsylvania and all of its departments et al
as 1:2017cv00193
Plaintiff:
James David Whitman
Defendant:
State of Pennsylvania and all of its departments, Post and Schell Law Firm and Erie Ins. Co of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Archie Armstrong v. State of Pennsylvania, et al
as 16-4103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCHIE G. ARMSTRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, WADE and MORAN, Officer
Don Ickes v. Craig Grassmyer, et al
as 16-3605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DON R. ICKES
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG GRASSMYER, BARRY AUGNST, THOMAS LASKEY and others
Bey v. State of Pennsylvania
as 1:2016cv01756
Petitioner:
Auset Maat Wisdom Bey
Respondent:
State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADDLESPURGER v. WECHT et al
as 2:2016cv01157
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ADDLESPURGER
Defendant:
DAVID WECHT, SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 2:2015cv01238
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, DEPARTMENT OF COURT RECORDS, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 2:2015cv01154
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, DEPARTMENT OF COURT RECORDS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
