Cases 1 - 10 of 20
FANTINO et al v. COUNTY OF WESTMORELAND et al
as 2:2021cv00910
Plaintiff:
JOHN FANTINO and DEBBIE FANTINO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF WESTMORELAND, WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON, JOHN R. WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vorobyev v. Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2020cv01384
Plaintiff:
Andrey Vorobyev
Defendant:
Laura Wolfe, Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSE v. PAWLOWSKI et al
as 5:2019cv03853
Defendant:
RAY O'CONNELL, ED PAWLOWSKI, JOHN DOE AND JANE ROE, INC., and others
Plaintiff:
JIMI ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SCOTT v. KERRY et al
as 2:2015cv05983
Plaintiff:
DAVID SCOTT
Defendant:
JOHN F. KERRY , JOHN DOE, JANE ROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
AKUBU v. WISEBACK et al
as 2:2015cv03399
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN AKUBU
Defendant:
WISEBACK, TRACY GRANT-PRATT, TYREE HOLMES-IRVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERS v. BUCKS COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv05517
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA ANDERS
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY, TERRANCE P. MOORE, DAVID DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCARDLE v. HUFNAGEL et al
as 1:2012cv00326
Defendant:
DANIEL F. CUSICK, JOHN DOE, ANNE M. MCARDLE and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL J. MCARDLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIFE v. SOTO et al
as 2:2012cv05540
Plaintiff:
SHANG LIFE
Defendant:
ANTONIO SOTO, MEE, JOHN DOE(S) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HASTY v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2012cv04335
Plaintiff:
JAMES HASTY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY , CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CARE, INC. , MARGARET CARILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORALES v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2012cv03798
Plaintiff:
CARLOS MORALES
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, JULIO M. ALGARIN, JAMES FREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
