Cases 1 - 9 of 9
FEAGIN v. LAWSON et al
as 2:2024cv05835
Plaintiff:
EVETTE CALEN FEAGIN
Defendant:
MR. LAWSON, JEANETTE MATOS and MR. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. BROMALL et al
as 2:2021cv00281
Defendant:
LESLIE J. SCHUPP, HONORABLE JUDGE CHRIS SCHERER, GEORGE C. BROMALL and others
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
THOMPSON et al v. ALTOONA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 3:2010cv00312
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY THOMPSON , DEBORAH SILLS and DAVID SILLS
Defendant:
ALTOONA HOUSING AUTHORITY and CHERYL JOHNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2010cv05990
Plaintiff:
BIENVENIDO THOMPSON
Defendant:
ANTONIO MARTINEZ, RALPH DEL CAPUA, MARY ANDREWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Steven Thompson v. Eva's Village and Sheltering P
as 09-2146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN C. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EVAS VILLAGE AND SHELTERING PROGRAM, et als, DERRICK WILLIAMS, GREGORY ANDERSON, Individually and others
THOMPSON v. EVA'S VILLAGE AMD SHELTERING PROGRAM et al
as 2:2009cv01510
Plaintiff:
STEVEN C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
EVA'S VILLAGE AMD SHELTERING PROGRAM, DERRICK WILLIAMS, GREGORY ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bernice Portis, et al v. River House Associates, et al
as 08-4429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNICE PORTIS and JOHN PORTIS
Defendant - Appellee:
RIVER HOUSE ASSOC, W RITTENHOUSE MGMT CO, DBA Korman Comm and MARY THOMPSON, individually and as an authorized agent and General Manager of Korman Communities
John Shipley, et al v. New Castle County, et al
as 08-2703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN S. SHIPLEY and ROCHELLE D. SHIPLEY
Defendant:
NEW CASTLE COUNTY, HERSHAL PUROHIT and DONNA THOMPSON
Shipley et al v. New Castle County et al
as 1:2008cv00341
Plaintiff:
John S. Shipley and Rochelle D. Shipley
Defendant:
New Castle County, Hershal Purohit and Donna Thompson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
