Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Daniel D'Ambly, et al v. Christian Exoo, et al
as 22-3034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL D'AMBLY
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN EXOO, a/k/a Antifash Gordon, ST. LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY, TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO LLC and others
Defendant:
COHEN WEISS AND SIMON LLP
D'AMBLY v. EXOO et al
as 2:2020cv12880
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN EXOO, VIJAYA GADDE, ANTIFASH GORDON and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL D'AMBLY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. RARITAN ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00142
Defendant:
TANYA WEISSMAN, M.D., RARITAN ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES, LLC, ENDO SURGI CENTER, P.A. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. RARITAN ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00139
Defendant:
TANYA WEISSMAN, M.D., RARITAN ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES, LLC, ENDO SURGI CENTER, P.A. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. ACUTE MEDICAL, P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv08030
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
ACUTE MEDICAL, P.C. , SIMON X LEE, M.D. , RANDOLPH ROSARION, M.D. and others
Counter_claimant:
ELIZABETH AVENUE CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, P.C. "1" , SIMON X LEE, M.D. , MORA CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, P.C. and others
Counter_defendant:
GEICO CASUALTY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC. et al v. PALOMBARO et al
as 2:2008cv01634
Plaintiff:
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P., NORTHGATE MALL PARTNERSHIP and others
Defendant:
MARK M. PALOMBARO, ABBY, INC., ROBERT E. CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
