Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 8,994
WOOD v. USA
as 2:2024cv00606
Petitioner: CLIFFORD WOOD
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BAKER v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05517
Petitioner: JONATHAN P. BAKER
Respondent: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HOWARD v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05434
Petitioner: RICHARD HOWARD
Respondent: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jason Amin-Bey v. USA
as 24-1649
Plaintiff: JASON L. AMIN-BEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WOODS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01827
Plaintiff: MARK WOODS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
KWASNIK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01363
Petitioner: MICHAEL W. KWASNIK
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GOODE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01668
Plaintiff: JAMES GOODE
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robert Reed v. Commissioner United States Parole Commission, et al
as 24-1687
Plaintiff: ROBERT ANDREW REED, a/k/a Robert Andrew Bey
Defendant: COMMISSIONER UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and CHRISTOPHER WHITMER, U.S. Parole Examiner Employee
BRADLEY v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05126
Petitioner: LAVAR BRADLEY
Respondent: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stephan Byrd v. USA
as 24-1647
Plaintiff: STEPHAN BYRD
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?