Cases 11 - 20 of 41
REPOTSKI v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
as 2:2015cv02885
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD BRANDON REPOTSKI
Respondent:
MICHAEL J. POUST, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Laibhen v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2014cv02055
Petitioner:
Clifford Laibhen
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons , Baltazar and Harrel Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bartlett v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2014cv00845
Petitioner:
William Clifford Bartlett
Respondent:
John Kerestes and John Corbett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fake v. Pitkins et al
as 3:2014cv00700
Petitioner:
Clifford E Fake
Respondent:
David W. Pitkins, PA State Attorney General and Lebanon County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLIFFORD, JR. v. KERESTES et al
as 5:2013cv06659
Petitioner:
RANSOM CLIFFORD, JR.
Respondent:
KERESTES, PA. BOARD OF PROBATION PAROLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clifford Murray v. David DiGuglielmo, et al
as 13-2463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD MURRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
WILSON v. DEPT. OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2013cv00427
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD WILSON
Respondent:
DEPT. OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ORLANDO HARPER, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRAF v. CUNNINGHAM et al
as 3:2013cv01468
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD J. GRAF
Respondent:
JOHN CUNNINGHAM and JEFFREY CHIESA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRIS v. RUBIN
as 2:2012cv01952
Petitioner:
ANTONIO CLIFFORD HARRIS
Respondent:
ANN R. RUBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lester v. Ebbert
as 1:2012cv00140
Petitioner:
Clifford Lester
Respondent:
David J Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
